This is essay begins by discussing the relationship between performance art and photography. She also talks about how crucial and important documentation is for a performance piece. Unfortunately, a majority of performance pieces that have taken place only have photo documentation, which does not do them justice. Personally I think photographs are a great form of documentation, however not always the best choice, especially when it comes to performance art. It should not be the only option. Olson uses Chris Burden’s “Shoot” as a perfect example of this. Like other performance pieces, Burden’s would have had the most impact if seen in person. For those today, however, who were unable to see the piece, I believe they would have benefited if they were able to see a video recording. A video would provide more of a shock than a photo, after seeing a sequence of the photos; the outcome would be pretty predictable. In this case, there isn't even any photographic evidence of the event, only after it had occurred. Olson also brings up a good point when it comes to the idea of how to exhibit a project, such as those at “Do It”. What does an artist do when they are not physically present or affecting the outcome? The artist would have to rely on the participant to document the act and share it.
The Surveillance Camera Players:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RILTl8mxEnE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment